Exam English

PTE Highlight Incorrect Words: Vocabulary and Near-Word Traps

Published Updated 10 min read Editorial standards

A learner connects passage cards, context clues, and precise word choices into one coherent route

PTE Highlight Incorrect Words presents a transcript while a recording plays. You follow the text and select words that differ from what the speaker says. Pearson's current task page states that each correctly selected word earns one point and each incorrect selection loses one point, with a minimum score of zero for the item. The task contributes to Listening and Reading.

That negative scoring rule makes restraint part of the lexical decision. You are not editing the transcript for style or choosing a word you think would be better. You are comparing sound with text and selecting a word only when the recording differs.

Near words create the hardest moments because both versions may be grammatical:

  • imply / infer;
  • complement / compliment;
  • comprise / composed;
  • continual / continuous;
  • historic / historical.

Knowing the distinction helps you track meaning and anticipate sound. It never replaces evidence from the recording.

Use the PTE Academic vocabulary hub and the broader Exam English hub for more practice.

The task is comparison, not correction

Imagine the transcript says:

The archive contains historical records from the early twentieth century.

You think historic sounds more impressive. Do not click. Historical records is natural because it means records connected with the past. Your preference is irrelevant unless the audio actually says historic.

Conversely, if the recording says historic decision while the transcript shows historical decision, the difference matters even though both phrases can be valid in some contexts. Select the displayed word because it does not match the sound.

Use three checks:

  1. Did the acoustic form differ?
  2. Does the surrounding grammar support what I heard?
  3. Is the difference strong enough to justify a selection under negative scoring?

A tracking method that protects attention

Pearson advises following the text with the cursor and selecting words that sound different. Use a simple process:

  • keep your cursor or visual focus on the current word;
  • compare in short meaning groups rather than isolated letters;
  • click a mismatch when evidence is clear;
  • if uncertain, keep moving with the recording;
  • do not return mentally to one doubtful word while later words are playing.

The recording plays once. Losing synchronization can cost several clear items after one uncertain item.

1. Imply and infer: source versus receiver

In careful edited English, a speaker, statement, wording, or piece of evidence implies; a reader, listener, or analyst infers from evidence.

The report implies that the schedule may change. Readers can infer from the report that the schedule may change.

Suppose the transcript reads:

From the repeated references to temporary funding, the analyst could infer that the programme was under review.

If the audio says infer, do not click merely because you expected conclude. If the audio clearly says imply, select infer because the transcript and recording differ—even though informal English sometimes uses infer in the source-side sense and the sentence may remain understandable.

Sound anchors:

  • imply begins /ɪm-/ and ends with a long “eye” sound;
  • infer begins /ɪn-/ and ends /-fɜːr/ or its accent equivalent.

Meaning can confirm a perceived difference, but do not manufacture one from the rule. The task asks what was spoken.

2. Complement and compliment: fit versus praise

Complement means complete or enhance a whole. Compliment means praise.

The visual data complement the written explanation. The reviewer complimented the author on the clear explanation.

The verbs are often pronounced identically, so audio alone may not distinguish their spelling. If the recording and displayed word sound the same, do not select the transcript word because its meaning seems wrong. This task tests differences between the recording and transcript, not silent spelling errors you imagine the speaker made.

However, morphology or surrounding words may create an audible difference:

complementary methods complimentary tickets

The forms can still sound very similar, but context helps you maintain the sentence meaning. Complimentary tickets may mean free tickets; complementary methods work well together. Only click when the acoustic mismatch is identifiable.

This pair demonstrates an important limit: vocabulary knowledge can prevent confusion, but some spelling distinctions are not recoverable from speech alone.

Understanding is only the first step.

Lyra Practice helps you retrieve and use high-value workplace expressions in realistic situations until they feel natural.

Start a practice session →

3. Comprise: listen for the full grammatical frame

Comprise is a formal verb for composition:

The course comprises four modules. A panel comprising three researchers reviewed the proposal.

The taught whole-to-parts frame uses no of after the active verb. Comprises of is a form error in careful edited English. The progressive is also not the normal composition pattern.

In Highlight Incorrect Words, listen for multiword differences:

Transcript:

The committee comprises five regional representatives.

If the audio says is composed of five regional representatives, the displayed word comprises differs from the recording, but the mismatch spans a phrase. Follow the interface behavior in the live item and select the displayed word or words that do not match what you heard; do not click unrelated neighboring words simply because the structures have different lengths.

Be careful with is comprised of. It is widely used and also objected to by some style authorities. Do not treat it as automatically wrong. Again, this is sound-to-text comparison, not a style test.

4. Continual and continuous: repeated versus unbroken

In careful usage, continual describes repeated events with possible pauses. Continuous describes something unbroken.

Continual interruptions made the discussion difficult. The sensor recorded continuous movement for ten minutes.

Informal usage can blur the distinction, so meaning alone is not enough to mark a word. Listen to the ending:

  • continual: typically four syllables, ending like -ual;
  • continuous: typically four syllables, ending like -uous, with an audible /s/ sound near the end.

Transcript:

The machine produced a continuous tone throughout the experiment.

If the recording says continual, select continuous. If the recording also says continuous, leave it alone, even if pauses would make continual more logical. You are not responsible for correcting the speaker's factual description.

5. Historic and historical: importance versus connection to the past

Historic normally asserts importance or likely importance in history. Historical can simply mean connected with the past, its study, records, or representation.

a historic agreement that permanently changed the institution historical data covering the previous century

The words overlap: an event can be both historical and historic if it belongs to the past and is important. Historical significance is also normal English. Do not use a simplistic “old versus important” rule to click.

Listen for the extra syllable in historical:

  • historic: his-TOR-ic;
  • historical: his-TOR-i-cal.

Transcript:

The museum preserves historical documents from several periods.

If the recording says historic documents, the displayed word differs and should be selected. If the audio says historical, do not select it merely because some documents seem important.

Morphology gives you acoustic checkpoints

Prefixes and suffixes help you follow the word stream:

Contrast What changes Meaning cue
imply / implied tense ending present versus past/participle
infer / inference verb versus noun ending action versus conclusion/result noun
complement / complementary added adjective ending verb/noun versus adjective
comprise / comprising participle ending main verb versus reduced clause
continual / continually adverb ending adjective versus manner/frequency adverb
historic / historically longer adverb form adjective versus adverb

Do not stare at the ending so intensely that you lose the phrase. Use the visible grammar to anticipate where an ending matters, then confirm it with the recording.

Negative scoring: when uncertainty remains

Pearson explicitly says a correct selected word receives one point and an incorrect selection loses one point, with the item score not falling below zero. Therefore, indiscriminate clicking is directly penalized.

A useful confidence rule is:

  • clear acoustic mismatch: select;
  • brief uncertainty but grammar and sound agree: usually continue without selecting;
  • meaning seems odd but audio matches the transcript: do not edit;
  • you lost synchronization: recover at the current phrase instead of clicking retrospectively at random.

This is not a formula for calculating an optimum score. It is a behavior grounded in the task rule: selections need sound evidence.

Worked comparison passage

Displayed transcript:

The report implies that the two surveys complement each other. Together they comprise a historical record of continual changes in the district.

Imagine the recording says:

The report infers that the two surveys compliment each other. Together they compose a historic record of continuous changes in the district.

Displayed words to select:

  1. implies — recording says infers;
  2. comprise — recording says compose;
  3. historical — recording says historic;
  4. continual — recording says continuous.

Do not count complement as a safely selectable mismatch in this imagined recording. Complement and compliment are normally homophones, so the audio does not provide reliable evidence for that spelling difference. Meaning may make one version more sensible, but this task does not ask you to copyedit the displayed text.

That limitation is important: practice scripts must not pretend every written near-word pair is audible.

Controlled micro-drills

Source and receiver

Displayed: The reviewer inferred that the omission was deliberate. Audio: The reviewer implied that the omission was deliberate.

Select inferred because the audio differs. Do not decide based only on which role seems more logical.

Composition frame

Displayed: The programme comprises three stages. Audio: The programme contains three stages.

Select comprises. Both sentences can be grammatical; only the sound mismatch matters.

Repetition versus continuity

Displayed: The device emitted a continual signal without interruption. Audio: The device emitted a continuous signal without interruption.

Select continual because the recording says continuous. The phrase without interruption also supports your perception.

Importance versus past connection

Displayed: The archive holds historic population records used by researchers. Audio: The archive holds historical population records used by researchers.

Select historic. The extra syllables in historical and the context reinforce the mismatch.

Recovery after a missed phrase

When you become uncertain:

  1. stop trying to reconstruct the earlier word while audio continues;
  2. locate the speaker again using the next content word;
  3. resume phrase-by-phrase comparison;
  4. leave the uncertain word unselected unless you have reliable evidence;
  5. avoid a late cluster of guesses based on meaning alone.

This protects later opportunities and respects the negative-scoring rule.

Build a near-word notebook for listening

Use four columns:

Pair Audible difference Meaning distinction Warning
imply / infer beginning and final sound source suggests / receiver concludes edited-English distinction has usage overlap
complement / compliment usually none completion/fit / praise homophones cannot reliably drive a click
comprise / compose consonants and ending whole has parts / create or make up compare the actual phrase
continual / continuous final sound sequence repeated with pauses / unbroken informal usage may blur meaning
historic / historical extra syllables historically important / related to past meanings overlap in some contexts

Practise with recordings, not written quizzes alone. The decision must become sound-linked.

Sources

Lyra Practice is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson.

How precise is your vocabulary in this situation?

Take a free situation-based assessment and find the vocabulary decisions worth practicing next.

Find my vocabulary gaps

More for exam english

Exam English →