In OET Writing, a small verb can change the clinical status of a fact. Reported does not mean confirmed. Suspected does not mean diagnosed. Recommended does not mean scheduled, and scheduled does not mean completed. Overstating case notes can make a letter inaccurate even when the sentence sounds fluent.
OET describes its Writing sub-test as a profession-specific letter based on case notes, with purpose and reader guiding the selection of relevant information. This article addresses language accuracy and communication only. Its fictional examples are not clinical instructions, do not establish an appropriate course of care, and should not be reused for real patients.
Use the Lyra Practice OET vocabulary hub and case-notes-to-letter guide for the broader writing route.
Use status labels
Keep these levels separate:
- reported: information attributed to the patient, family, or another source;
- observed/recorded: directly documented finding;
- suspected/possible: interpretation not established;
- confirmed/diagnosed: established status, only if the notes say so;
- recommended/planned: intended or advised action;
- scheduled: booked action;
- completed: action already performed;
- pending: result or decision not yet available.
These labels are not a clinical hierarchy, and pending can apply to a result or action at several stages. The writing rule is simply to preserve the exact status documented in the notes rather than silently converting it into a more certain or more complete status.
Mistake 1: reported becomes confirmed
Case note: “Patient says pain began after lifting boxes.”
Before: “The pain was caused by lifting boxes.”
After: “The patient reported that the pain began after lifting boxes.”
The note establishes timing and source, not proven causation. Reported keeps the attribution visible.
Mistake 2: suspected becomes diagnosed
Case note: “Possible medication reaction; review requested.”
Before: “She has a medication allergy.”
After: “A medication reaction is suspected, and a review has been requested.”
The repair preserves uncertainty and the requested next action. It does not name an allergy that the note has not confirmed.
Mistake 3: recommended becomes arranged
Case note: “Physiotherapy recommended; patient to decide.”
Before: “Physiotherapy has been arranged.”
After: “Physiotherapy was recommended, but the patient has not yet decided whether to proceed.”
Recommended, referred, booked, commenced, and completed mark different stages. Select the exact one documented.
Mistake 4: pending becomes normal
Case note: “Blood-test result pending.”
Before: “The blood test was normal.”
After: “The blood-test result is pending.”
Absence of a documented abnormality is not evidence of a normal result. If the receiving reader needs to act, state who will follow up only if the notes assign that responsibility.
Understanding is only the first step.
Lyra Practice helps you retrieve and use high-value workplace expressions in realistic situations until they feel natural.
Start a practice session →Mistake 5: improvement becomes recovery
Case note: “Mobility improved; still requires assistance on stairs.”
Before: “The patient has fully recovered mobility.”
After: “Mobility has improved, although the patient still requires assistance on stairs.”
The contrast is clinically relevant to continuity of care. Improved describes direction, while recovered may imply a completed return to prior function.
Mistake 6: one observation becomes a persistent pattern
Case note: “Appeared anxious during today’s consultation.”
Before: “The patient is chronically anxious.”
After: “The patient appeared anxious during today’s consultation.”
Keep the time boundary. One encounter does not establish duration or diagnosis.
Mistake 7: a request becomes an instruction already accepted
Case note: “Please assess swallowing and advise on management.”
Before: “You will begin swallowing therapy.”
After: “I am referring Ms. Patel for assessment of her swallowing difficulties and advice regarding further management.”
The receiving professional is asked to assess and advise. The writer should not predetermine an intervention that has not been documented.
Mistake 8: irrelevant detail changes the implied priority
Overstatement can occur through selection as well as vocabulary. A long history of resolved, unrelated details may make them look current or important.
Before: “Mr. Chen had a minor ankle injury twelve years ago…” followed by several sentences, although the letter requests current follow-up after discharge.
After: Omit the resolved history unless it affects the current purpose. State the current status, relevant treatment or support, and requested follow-up.
Relevance depends on purpose and reader, not merely on whether a note exists.
Full case-note repair
Original fictional notes:
- 9 Sept: patient reports dizziness twice when standing;
- blood pressure lower on standing during review;
- medication contribution possible;
- medication review requested, appointment not yet confirmed;
- no fall reported;
Overstated letter passage:
“Ms. Green has a medication-induced balance disorder and has fallen several times. Her medication appointment is scheduled, and the problem will be resolved after the prescription is changed.”
The draft invents a diagnosis, falls, a confirmed appointment, a treatment change, and an outcome.
Faithful repair:
“Ms. Green reported two episodes of dizziness on standing, and a postural reduction in blood pressure was recorded during review. A medication contribution is possible; therefore, a medication review has been requested, although the appointment is not yet confirmed. She reported no falls.”
The revision preserves source, finding, uncertainty, action status, and the documented negative fact. It makes no new clinical recommendation.
Keep dates and actors attached
Case notes may contain multiple professionals and time points. Clarify who did what:
- “The patient reported…”
- “The community nurse observed…”
- “The specialist recommended…”
- “A review was booked for…”
- “Results remain pending as of…”
Avoid a chain of passive sentences if it hides responsibility. At the same time, use passive voice naturally when the action matters more than the actor: “A follow-up appointment has been scheduled for October 4.”
Keep language practice separate from clinical judgment
An OET writing exercise can test whether reported, suspected, requested, or scheduled matches supplied notes. It cannot determine which assessment, diagnosis, referral, treatment, or safety advice is appropriate for an actual person. In practice materials, include a clinical action only when the fictional case notes explicitly document it, and preserve the documented actor and stage.
If a note is ambiguous, do not repair it by inventing medicine. Mark the ambiguity in your review material or rewrite the fictional note so the language answer is deterministic. If a real-world situation involves urgent symptoms, risk, medication, or treatment, follow the relevant professional protocols and qualified clinical guidance rather than an exam-language example.
This boundary also improves writing accuracy. The candidate's job is to communicate the provided case faithfully for the stated reader and purpose—not to fill gaps with plausible-sounding clinical assumptions.
Audit every certainty verb
After drafting, highlight has, caused, confirmed, diagnosed, will, requires, recovered, and completed. Return to the fictional notes and identify the exact words that authorize each claim. If the source says “may,” “possible,” “reported,” or “to be arranged,” restore that boundary in the letter. This is not an instruction to hedge every fact. A documented completed action should remain completed, and a confirmed result should remain confirmed.
Run a second audit for negative claims. “No concern documented” is not automatically “no concern exists.” “No fall reported” accurately preserves the source and speaker; “the patient did not fall” may claim more than the notes establish. Attribution protects both accuracy and clarity.
Finally, compare the opening purpose with the requested action at the end. A referral for assessment should not quietly become a demand for a predetermined treatment. The status language must remain consistent from the first sentence to the closing request.
Practice with Lyra Practice
Practice status vocabulary through the OET hub, then use the OET letter-purpose guide to decide what the reader needs. Convert ten fictional notes into a status table with columns for source, certainty, time, action stage, and reader relevance. Draft only after every strong verb matches the table.
Final self-check
- Who is the source of each symptom or event?
- Is the information observed, suspected, or confirmed?
- Did I turn temporal sequence into unsupported causation?
- Is an action recommended, requested, scheduled, started, or completed?
- Are pending results still labeled pending?
- Did I preserve remaining limitations alongside improvement?
- Does every included detail serve the letter’s purpose and reader?
- Have I added any diagnosis, treatment, or outcome not stated in the notes?
Sources
Related
- OET Vocabulary Practice
- OET case notes to letter vocabulary
- OET writing vocabulary by letter purpose
- OET referral-letter vocabulary
- OET discharge-letter vocabulary
OET is a trademark of Cambridge Boxhill Language Assessment. Lyra Practice is not affiliated with or endorsed by OET or Cambridge Boxhill Language Assessment.