Exam English

Cambridge C1 Part 1: Collocations for Evidence and Decisions

Published Updated 9 min read Editorial standards

A learner connects passage cards, context clues, and precise word choices into one coherent route

Four verbs can share a general meaning and still not share the same noun. English speakers draw a conclusion, reach a verdict, raise an objection, and cast doubt. The verb is not chosen independently; the whole partnership carries the answer.

That partnership is a central concern in Cambridge C1 Advanced Reading and Use of English Part 1. The task is a text with eight gaps and four options for each gap. Cambridge’s current format page identifies collocations, idioms, shades of meaning, phrasal verbs, and fixed phrases as possible targets. This lesson isolates one manageable C1 problem: verb–noun combinations used when writers discuss evidence and decisions.

For broader preparation, visit the Cambridge C1/C2 vocabulary practice hub and the complete Exam English collection.

Read the noun before choosing the verb

A useful first pass is to circle the noun controlled by the gap. If the sentence says “___ a conclusion,” the noun rules out many verbs that make sense in the general situation. Then inspect grammar, time, and the surrounding argument.

Draw a conclusion; reach a conclusion

Both draw and reach can combine with conclusion, but they highlight slightly different routes. To draw a conclusion from evidence foregrounds inference. To reach a conclusion after discussion foregrounds arrival at a considered endpoint. There is overlap, so a fair item needs a clue such as from these figures or after three hours of debate.

Do not assume that only one combination is grammatical in every context. In Part 1, the full set of options and the full sentence must make the intended answer defensible.

Reach a verdict; deliver a verdict

A jury, panel, or reviewer may reach a verdict after deliberating. A judge, jury, or authorised body may then deliver or return a verdict, depending on context. Reaching concerns forming the decision; delivering concerns announcing it. A passage that says the panel had decided privately but had not spoken publicly separates the two stages.

Raise an objection; lodge an objection

To raise an objection is to introduce it for consideration. To lodge an objection is more formal and often suggests an official procedure. Voice an objection focuses on expressing it. The nouns overlap, but register and process clues can decide: a statutory deadline and written form support lodge; a participant interrupting a meeting may raise or voice one.

Cast doubt; dispel doubt

To cast doubt on a claim makes it seem less certain. To dispel doubt removes uncertainty. Their directions are opposite even though both occur near evidence. Check whether the new information weakens confidence or restores it. Also preserve the preposition: cast doubt on, not normally cast doubt about in this tested frame.

Lend support; provide evidence

Facts may lend support to a theory. A study may provide evidence for a theory. Support is usually uncountable here; evidence is also normally uncountable. The verbs are not freely interchangeable: lend evidence is not the normal combination, and provide support is possible but changes which noun is selected.

Exercise judgment; make a decision

To exercise judgment is to use one’s ability to decide wisely. To make a decision is to choose. The first can describe the quality or faculty involved without naming a final choice. A regulator may exercise judgment in deciding whether an exception is justified.

Original eight-gap practice

The original practice passage and options below were written for this article. They are not Cambridge exam material and do not predict a live paper.

Understanding is only the first step.

Lyra Practice helps you retrieve and use high-value workplace expressions in realistic situations until they feel natural.

Start a practice session →

Restoring a footpath

A local council had to decide whether to reopen a riverside footpath after winter flooding. During a two-day inspection, engineers (1) ______ evidence by taking repeated measurements of the unstable bank. The figures nevertheless (2) ______ doubt on the claim that the route was already safe.

Business owners (3) ______ an objection to a lengthy closure, arguing that fewer walkers would reach the town centre. Rather than immediately (4) ______ a decision, the council requested a second survey. Its results (5) ______ support to the engineers’ warning and allowed the panel to (6) ______ a firmer conclusion from a broader set of readings.

After discussing a temporary diversion, the panel finally (7) ______ a verdict in favour of reopening only the northern section. The chair announced that decision the following morning, explaining that the panel had needed to (8) ______ judgment because neither a complete closure nor an unrestricted reopening matched the evidence.

  1. A conducted B gathered C harvested D occupied
  2. A pressed B cast C sent D placed
  3. A lifted B grew C raised D mounted
  4. A doing B making C forming D setting
  5. A lent B borrowed C rented D advanced
  6. A pull B draw C sketch D attract
  7. A reached B arrived C achieved D touched
  8. A operate B perform C exercise D train

Answers and rationales

  1. B, gathered. Researchers and investigators gather evidence by collecting relevant information. The method phrase by taking repeated measurements explicitly describes collection. The other verbs do not form the required collocation with evidence in this frame.

  2. B, cast. The figures make the safety claim less certain, so they cast doubt on it. The other verbs do not form the established verb + doubt + on combination in this frame.

  3. C, raised. The owners introduce a concern during deliberation, so they raise an objection. There is no formal filing procedure to license lodge, and it is not offered. The other verbs do not collocate with objection in this meaning.

  4. B, making. The fixed combination is make a decision. Form a decision is not the normal expression, although a person can form an opinion. The gerund is required after rather than because the sentence coordinates it with the surrounding action.

  5. A, lent. The second survey lent support to the engineers’ warning: it strengthened the warning without being described as absolute proof. Borrowed reverses the direction associated with literal lending. The remaining verbs do not form the phrase.

  6. B, draw. The phrase draw a conclusion from evidence foregrounds inference from the broader readings. Reach a conclusion would also be possible English, but it is not among the options; from strongly reinforces the inference frame.

  7. A, reached. The panel formed its verdict after discussion. It reached a verdict. Arrive would require at; achieve and touch do not collocate with verdict here.

  8. C, exercise. The council had to use discretion between imperfect alternatives, so it exercised judgment. The phrase does not mean physical training, and the other verbs are not natural partners for judgment in this sense.

Why this is C1 rather than a synonym quiz

At C1, knowing that gather, collect, and assemble all relate to bringing things together is insufficient. You need reliable phrase control and enough sensitivity to notice an inference cue such as from. Yet the distinctions should remain teachable and visible. The task should not depend on an obscure specialist use or on guessing what an examiner personally prefers.

The passage also creates a decision chain. Initial readings cast doubt; later results lend support; the panel draws a conclusion and reaches a verdict. Tracking that chain prevents polarity errors. If the survey had shown the bank was stable, it might have dispelled doubts rather than cast them.

Contrast drill

Choose the completion that preserves both collocation and event stage.

  1. After four hours of private discussion, the committee finally reached / delivered a verdict. It will announce it tomorrow.
  2. The newly recovered records cast / dispelled doubt on the witness’s account because they contradicted its timeline.
  3. Residents must raise / lodge a written objection with the planning office by 30 September.
  4. From the repeated pattern, analysts drew / delivered the conclusion that demand was seasonal.
  5. The chair asked members to make / exercise judgment when applying the broad guideline to unusual cases.

Answers: 1 reached, because the verdict was formed but not announced; 2 cast, because confidence decreased; 3 lodge, because the formal filing process and deadline are explicit; 4 drew, because the conclusion is inferred from a pattern; 5 exercise, because members are using discretion rather than merely selecting an option.

Build better distractors

When you create practice, make wrong answers wrong for a named reason. One distractor may take the wrong preposition: arrive a verdict. Another may fit the topic but not the noun: achieve a verdict. A third may reverse the direction: dispel where evidence creates doubt.

Avoid presenting two acceptable collocations without a separating clue. In “After reviewing the file, they ___ a conclusion,” both drew and reached may be defensible. Add “from the pattern of omissions” to favour drew, or “after a long debate” to favour reached. Deterministic practice trains language; arbitrary exclusion trains guessing.

A repeatable Part 1 check

For each gap:

  1. Identify the noun and any attached preposition.
  2. Decide the direction: does the evidence strengthen, weaken, create, or remove certainty?
  3. Locate the event stage: collecting, inferring, deciding, or announcing.
  4. Test the complete verb–noun unit aloud.
  5. Use the wider passage to reject an option that reverses the logic.

This method is deliberately narrower than memorising a long vocabulary list. A compact network—gather evidence, cast doubt, lend support, draw a conclusion, reach a verdict—lets you compare related actions without treating them as interchangeable.

Independent practice

Write a 100-word account of a school deciding whether to retain a new timetable. Include four gaps. Test one evidence collocation, one doubt/support contrast, one conclusion phrase, and one decision-stage phrase. Supply four options per gap. Then write a one-sentence rationale naming the decisive noun, preposition, polarity, or stage. If two answers survive, revise the context rather than declaring one “more advanced.”

Sources

Lyra Practice is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cambridge University Press & Assessment.

How precise is your vocabulary in this situation?

Take a free situation-based assessment and find the vocabulary decisions worth practicing next.

Find my vocabulary gaps

More for exam english

Exam English →