A C1 Advanced speaking prompt asks two candidates to discuss ways a town could attract more visitors. One candidate says:
"I shall play devil's advocate. The municipal transport deficiencies are par for the course, and a middle ground should be implemented."
Every phrase is advanced. The whole answer still sounds assembled from a textbook. Shall clashes with a live discussion. Par for the course sounds as if poor transport is a normal problem that people simply accept. Implement a middle ground is not a natural pattern.
A more natural answer could be:
"Let me play devil's advocate for a second. Better transport may bring visitors in, but what would make them stay? Perhaps the middle ground is to improve one bus route and fund events at the same time."
Cambridge describes C1 Advanced as testing control of grammar and vocabulary across several kinds of text and interaction. In Writing Part 2, the task gives you a context, purpose, and target reader. In Speaking, you exchange and justify ideas with another candidate. The lexical decision is therefore not "Which advanced word can I add?" It is "Which word does this job naturally here?"
The lexical decision: does the expression fit the move?
Natural vocabulary fits three things at once:
- the meaning you intend;
- the grammar and collocation the word requires;
- the relationship between the speakers or between writer and reader.
That is why a familiar word used precisely often works better than an idiom placed for decoration. The five expressions below are useful because each makes a clear move. They are not interchangeable signs of an advanced level.
1. Par for the course vs. normal: a pattern with a tone
Par for the course means typical or unsurprising in a known situation, often with mild resignation about something inconvenient.
"Several rounds of revision are par for the course with a project of this size."
The phrase needs an established pattern. It does not mean acceptable, good enough, or standard practice. If a report says a serious safety failure was "par for the course," the writer can sound dismissive. A neutral alternative is safer:
"Delays are common during the first phase, but the current delay needs action."
Compare its near-words:
- Normal is broad and neutral.
- To be expected presents an outcome as predictable.
- Standard practice names an established procedure, not a recurring event.
- Business as usual means normal operations continue.
- Par for the course frames an event as part of a recurring pattern and may carry a wry tone.
Use the fixed form be par for the course. Keep the. A unique surprise with no earlier pattern cannot be par for the course.
2. Middle ground vs. compromise: name the position
Middle ground is a position between two competing demands. You can find, seek, or reach middle ground between X and Y.
"We could find middle ground between free entry and a high ticket price by charging only for special exhibits."
Compromise can name the act of making concessions or its result. Middle ground points to the shared position itself. Common ground is different again: it is what both sides already share before negotiating.
Natural use needs detail. We need a middle ground is grammatical but vague. The stronger sentence names both poles and the actual choice:
"A weekend-only service offers middle ground between closing the route and running empty buses all week."
For a position already held, use a static verb: the plan occupies a middle ground between X and Y. Before a noun, hyphenate it: a middle-ground option. Do not write middle grounds.
This phrase suits a proposal, report, essay, or collaborative discussion when two real demands must be balanced. It does not describe uncertainty about a rule; that is a gray area. It also does not mean avoiding a decision; that is sitting on the fence.
Understanding is only the first step.
Lyra Practice helps you retrieve and use high-value workplace expressions in realistic situations until they feel natural.
Start a practice session →3. Play devil's advocate vs. disagree: a test, not a hidden view
To play devil's advocate is to raise a serious objection for the purpose of testing an idea. The preface signals that the objection may not be your own position.
"Let me play devil's advocate: if the campaign succeeds, can the town handle twice as many weekend visitors?"
The fixed form matters: play devil's advocate, with the possessive apostrophe. You play the role in relation to an idea or plan, not a person.
Near-words change the social move:
- Disagree states a view you really hold.
- Push back on actively resists a proposal or request.
- Advocate for means genuinely support something—the near-opposite of playing devil's advocate.
- Stress-test can describe a wider analytical process, not only an objection in conversation.
This expression is most useful before a decision, when a hard question can improve the result. It becomes awkward if you use it to hide a real objection or repeatedly block progress. In a timed speaking task, one well-placed challenge can move the exchange forward. Three in a row can make collaboration impossible.
4. Candid vs. honest: chosen openness
Candid describes a choice to give a real opinion or assessment instead of smoothing it into vague language.
"To be candid, the exhibition was beautifully designed but offered little for children."
Honest is broader. It can mean truthful in conduct or speech. Candid focuses on being open when silence or polish would be easier. Blunt focuses on force and lack of softening; candid speech can still be tactful. Transparent usually concerns access to information or a process, not one person's direct opinion.
Useful patterns include:
- be candid about a topic;
- be candid with a person;
- a candid assessment or candid feedback;
- to be candid as a sentence-opening frame.
The noun is candor (or British candour), not a candid: I appreciated her candor. In a review, candid can signal that praise and criticism are both real. In an email to a person with less power, however, Let me be candid may sound severe. The words after the preface still need care.
5. Pithy vs. short: brief and meaningful
Pithy is approving. It describes language that carries a substantial point in few, well-chosen words.
"The guide ends with a pithy summary: 'Come for the coast; stay for the culture.'"
A one-word answer is short, but it is not automatically pithy. A pithy line preserves the result, insight, decision, or memorable contrast. Concise is more neutral: it simply avoids unnecessary words. Terse often suggests that a reply is so short it feels unfriendly. Succinct is a formal, approving near-word for clear brevity.
Use pithy to describe a summary, headline, remark, or explanation. It is not a command to remove needed evidence. An essay still has to develop its points. A report may contain a pithy recommendation, but the evidence beneath it should remain.
Textbook-loaded vs. natural: the same answer
Prompt: Discuss whether a city should spend its tourism budget on transport or cultural events.
Textbook-loaded version:
"To be candid, inadequate transport is par for the course. I play devil's advocate that cultural events are substantial. We must implement middle ground, in a pithy manner."
More natural version:
"Better transport looks like the obvious choice. Let me play devil's advocate, though: visitors need a reason to travel, not only an easier journey. The middle ground might be a better weekend bus service tied to a small events programme. To be candid, neither option will work alone."
The second answer is not stronger because it contains more advanced vocabulary. It is stronger because every expression performs its real job:
- play devil's advocate frames a hypothetical challenge;
- middle ground names a position between two options;
- to be candid introduces a direct assessment;
- no idiom is forced into an unnatural verb pattern.
Common mistakes
- Treating idioms as level badges. Use an idiom only when its meaning and tone fit.
- Using par for the course to mean acceptable. It means typical, often with resignation.
- Writing implement a middle ground. Find, reach, propose, or occupy middle ground; then name what it is.
- Using play devil's advocate for a sincere objection. If you truly disagree, say so and give the reason.
- Using candid as a noun. The noun is candor or candour.
- Calling any short line pithy. It must also carry substance.
- Assuming natural means informal. Natural language can be formal, neutral, or conversational. It fits its setting.
Quick check
1. A candidate wants to raise a hypothetical weakness before a decision. Which opening fits?
A. "I advocate for the weakness." B. "Let me play devil's advocate for a moment." C. "I am candid the weakness."
2. Which sentence uses middle ground precisely?
A. "We implemented middle grounds." B. "The policy is a gray middle ground because nobody understands it." C. "A weekend service offers middle ground between full closure and daily operation."
3. Which statement about pithy is accurate?
A. Every short reply is pithy. B. A pithy summary is brief and meaning-dense. C. Pithy language must be humorous.
Answers: 1-B, 2-C, 3-B. The first answer frames a deliberate stress test. The second names two poles and the position between them. The third preserves both parts of pithy: brevity and substance.
Practice prompt
Speaking Part 3 style: two candidates are discussing how a company could reduce staff travel—better video systems, fewer conferences, local offices, or stricter approval rules.
Write six lines of dialogue. Use play devil's advocate once to test an idea. Use middle ground once and state the actual compromise. Add either candid or par for the course only if its tone fits. Finish with a pithy one-sentence decision that still contains a reason.
To practise choosing natural advanced expressions in real contexts, try Lyra Practice. Lyra Practice is not affiliated with Cambridge University Press & Assessment.